In my last FAANG-related article‘s thread there was a discussion regarding the longevity and sustainability of certain leading companies from very different sectors – Facebook (FB) versus Wal-Mart (WMT).
If I’m to sum up the discussion it evolves about three main questions:
- Within which type of sector/industry (old-traditional versus new-innovative) it’s easier for a leader to maintain its leadership?
- Do we have a longer and clearer view when we try to foresee the future of a leading corporation belonging to an old-traditional versus new-innovative sector?
- What can derail leading companies belonging to different (old-traditional versus new-innovative) sectors and are the potentially derailing factors completely different from each other?
Interesting questions indeed.
Truth is, there are no ultimate rules or guidelines to follow when it comes to divergences. We are all very smart retrospectively but it’s much more difficult to identify a divergence in real time.
Furthermore, in many cases a new divergence marks the end of an opposite one.
In this article we are touching upon some of the most incredible divergences we’ve have witnessed over the past 25 years. We intentionally haven’t tried to put up the most shocking numbers (it’s easy to find much more extreme cases than we did) rather to point at certain events/developments that the relevant-affected stocks (and, in most cases, the world as a whole) never been the same anymore.
About seven years ago the SPDR Gold Trust ETF was the largest ETF in the world with ~$77.5B assets under management (AuM). At that time, the second largest ETF in the world was the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF with “only” ~$76.5B of AuM. Today, SPY has ~8.4x more AuM than the GLD.
Two brick and mortar retail eREITs (VNQ) but while the former is focusing on the higher end of the retail space, the latter is engaged with the lower-end of the segment. The result? Over the past twelve years O’s shareholders have been very happy shoppers while for CBL’s shareholders this has been a long-sad sale with finding any bargain.
The past four years have seen a major divergence in the market. The energy sector, one of the old and most reliable sectors, has lost its appeal (alongside the declining energy prices) for the young, innovative and jumpy technology sector. There were no fireworks when it comes to the energy sector.
Ten years ago, Blackberry was a world-leading manufacturer of smartphone. Most large corporations across the world still used BB as their main/sole business supplier.
Ten years ago AAPL’s market-cap wasn’t much above 2x the market-cap of BB. Last year, at the peak, the ratio was over 200x…
Total Returns during that past 10 years: AAPL +766.1%, BB -90.5%…
We have everything that Netflix has, plus the immediate gratification of never having to wait for a movie – Blockbuster CEO, January 2007
It was January 15th 2007 when Netflix announced that it will launch a streaming video. Since then Netflix has returned over 12,700%. Meanwhile, Blockbuster has disappeared…
NFLX data by YCharts
Snapchat, the second-largest US-based technology IPO, went public on March 2nd, 2017. Back then, Twitter market-cap was $11B versus Snapchat’s $28B. 500 days later and Twitter market-cap has tripled to over $33B while Snapchat market-cap is ~40% off to less than $17B
Remember the small online book seller, called Amazon,com, that was founded on July 5th, 1994 and went public on May 15th, 1997? Since the business was, back then, all about selling books it was often compared to the giant (brick and mortar) book seller Barnes & Noble.
Why Barnes & Noble May Crush Amazon – Fortune, September 29th, 1997Once you look beyond the Website you begin to see why, in this battle at least, the odds favor the $3-billion-a-year Goliath.
During the 21+ years since Amazon’s IPO, the total return of BKS is -6.43% while that of AMZN is +92,450%…
Over the past few weeks I’ve touched upon the once-leading German bank twice (the last time can be found here). The below chart is taken from the first article, “The Italian Job – Part III: Deutsche Bank Vs. JPMorgan“.
The largest banks (at the time) in the US and in Europe have moved in two different directions since the end of the financial crisis.
Conclusions? Just like James Bond 007 we have seven of those:
1. Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) style conclusion: Strive for excellence and keep an open mind. Better quality makes a difference.
2. Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) style conclusion: Maintain an open communication channel. Constant (undisputed) streaming is key.
4. Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) style conclusion: Socialize and listen to what others have to say. They may come up with something you haven’t thought about.
5. Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) style conclusion: Find and discover anything you wish for. Being customer-centric is being human-focused.
6. Microsoft (MSFT) style conclusion: Prepare to open new windows. Empower yourself to achieve more.
7. ….and one Wheel of FORTUNE style conclusion: Never Say Never Again!
Author’s note: If you like this article, please scroll up and follow us. In order to make the most out of following us, please make sure that you’re not only following us, but also doing so at real time:
That’s the only way to get notifications regarding both articles and blog posts (such as this one) that we publish at real time.
The Wheel of FORTUNE is one of SA Marketplace most comprehensive services. Our universe (of coverage) is unlimited and we touched upon all types of securities: common stocks, preferred shares, public bonds, baby bonds, options, currencies, commodities and even multiple strategies.
Since 3/1/18 Trapping Value is part of The Wheel of FORTUNE, so you now get two for the price of one.
Take advantage of a two-week, free of charge, first-hand experience before you commit to the service on a longer-term basis.
Make sure you read the reviews (178/180 possible stars) subscribers wrote about the service to gain a better understanding of what you may expect out of it.
Disclosure: I am/we are long TWTR, JPM.
I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Additional disclosure: Short O as well as $50 (covered) PUTs & $60 (naked) CALLs
Short vertical bull call spread on NFLX
Short vertical bull call spread on FB
Long and short a few (both CALL and PUT) options involving SPY